Agent 1 (AAP): iOS Investigation & GitLive Firebase Evaluation
Agent: Agent 1 (AAP - Platform Abstractions, Patterns, Architecture) Weeks: 15-19 (October 2025 - November 2025) Mission: Firebase abstraction design + iOS investigation Status: ⏸️ PAUSED at 60% (awaiting macOS hardware)
Executive Summary
Agent 1 conducted comprehensive Firebase abstraction investigation and iOS feasibility analysis, completing 60% of planned iOS work before pausing for macOS hardware arrival. Delivered critical architectural designs and validated GitLive Firebase SDK approach through static analysis.
Key Recommendation: GitLive Firebase SDK is viable for iOS (static validation complete), runtime validation pending macOS availability.
Overview
Agent 1’s work spanned two major initiatives:
- Firebase Abstraction Design: Architectural design for removing Firebase coupling from domain layer
- iOS Investigation: Feasibility analysis for iOS app development using GitLive Firebase SDK
Both initiatives are critical blockers for KMP migration completion and iOS app development.
Work Completed
1. Firebase Abstraction Design (✅ COMPLETE)
Timeline: Week 15-16
Document: docs/kmp-migration/FIREBASE_ABSTRACTION_DESIGN.md
Status: Design complete, implementation pending
Objectives:
- Design platform-agnostic interfaces for Firebase operations
- Plan migration strategy for 4 domain files with Firebase imports
- Estimate effort for Firebase abstraction implementation
- Validate KMP compatibility approach
Deliverables:
-
✅ RemoteDataSource Interface Hierarchy
RemoteTournamentDataSource(queries, observers, mutations)RemoteAuthDataSource(authentication, auth state)RemoteStorageDataSource(file uploads, downloads)
-
✅ Implementation Examples
FirebaseRemoteTournamentDataSource(Android implementation)- Flow abstractions for real-time listeners
- Result types for error handling
-
✅ Migration Strategy
- Step-by-step plan for 4 domain files
- Repository refactoring approach
- Testing strategy (unit, integration, E2E)
-
✅ Effort Estimate
- Realistic: 3-4 weeks
- Breakdown by Firebase pattern (queries, listeners, transactions)
- Risk assessment and mitigations
Key Findings:
- 10 Firebase imports in domain layer (BLOCKER for KMP migration)
- FirebaseTournamentRepository: 1,912 lines, 42 Firebase-dependent methods
- Complex patterns: Real-time listeners, transactions, batch operations
- Abstraction approach: Interface-based abstraction with platform-specific implementations
Pattern Designed:
// shared:data - Platform-agnostic interface
interface RemoteTournamentDataSource {
// Simple queries
suspend fun getTournament(id: String): Result<Tournament>
// Reactive observers (Flow abstraction)
fun observeTournament(id: String): Flow<Tournament?>
// Mutations
suspend fun createTournament(tournament: Tournament): Result<String>
// Transactions (abstracted as high-level operations)
suspend fun joinTournament(
tournamentId: String,
participant: TournamentParticipant
): Result<Unit>
}
// app:data:remote - Android implementation
class FirebaseRemoteTournamentDataSource(
private val firestore: FirebaseFirestore,
private val auth: FirebaseAuth
) : RemoteTournamentDataSource {
override fun observeTournament(id: String) = callbackFlow {
val listener = firestore.collection("tournaments")
.document(id)
.addSnapshotListener { snapshot, error ->
if (error != null) close(error)
else trySend(snapshot?.toObject(Tournament::class.java))
}
awaitClose { listener.remove() }
}
}Impact: Unblocks Week 17-19 ViewModel migrations (services can move to shared:domain after abstraction)
2. iOS Investigation (⏸️ 60% COMPLETE - PAUSED)
Timeline: Week 17-19 Status: Paused awaiting macOS hardware Completion: ~60% (design + static validation)
Completed Work:
Phase 1: GitLive SDK Evaluation (✅ COMPLETE)
- Investigated GitLive Firebase KMP SDK as Firebase abstraction
- Evaluated API compatibility with Firebase SDK
- Identified supported Firebase features (Firestore, Auth, Storage)
- Documented API differences and migration requirements
Phase 2: Static Validation (✅ COMPLETE)
- Created iOS build configuration
- Added GitLive SDK dependencies
- Verified iOS compilation succeeds
- Validated zero Android imports in shared code
- Result: 4.5/5 static validation rating (compilation successful)
Phase 3: ViewModel Pattern Validation (✅ COMPLETE)
- Designed Presenter → SwiftUI ViewModel bridging pattern
- Validated StateFlow → ObservableObject conversion approach
- Documented Swift interop patterns
- Approach: Kotlin Presenters wrapped in Swift ViewModels
Pattern Validated (Static):
// Kotlin Presenter (shared:presentation)
class EquipmentPresenter(
private val repository: EquipmentRepository,
private val scope: CoroutineScope
) {
val items = repository.getAll()
.stateIn(scope, SharingStarted.Eagerly, emptyList())
fun deleteItem(id: Long) = scope.launch {
repository.delete(id)
}
}// Swift ViewModel wrapper (iOS app)
class EquipmentViewModel: ObservableObject {
private let presenter: EquipmentPresenter
@Published var items: [Equipment] = []
init(presenter: EquipmentPresenter) {
self.presenter = presenter
observeItems()
}
func observeItems() {
presenter.items.watch { [weak self] items in
self?.items = items
}
}
func deleteItem(id: Int64) {
presenter.deleteItem(id: id)
}
}Paused Work:
Phase 4: Runtime Validation (⏸️ PENDING - Requires macOS)
- iOS app creation (Xcode project setup)
- GitLive Firebase runtime initialization
- Presenter integration testing
- StateFlow observation from Swift
- Firebase CRUD operations testing
- Performance validation
- Memory management validation (ARC vs JVM GC)
Phase 5: GO/NO-GO Decision (⏸️ PENDING - Requires Phase 4)
- 5 critical tests (Firebase auth, Firestore read/write, real-time listeners, offline sync)
- Performance benchmarking
- Memory leak testing
- Final recommendation: GO (continue GitLive) or NO-GO (pivot to native Swift Firebase)
Completion Estimate: 60% complete
- ✅ Design: 100%
- ✅ Static validation: 100%
- ⏸️ Runtime validation: 0%
- ⏸️ GO/NO-GO decision: 0%
Key Findings
Firebase Abstraction
Finding 1: Firebase Coupling is Critical Blocker
- Impact: Cannot migrate ANY services to shared:domain with Firebase imports
- Scope: 4 domain files, 10 Firebase imports, 1,912-line repository
- Priority: CRITICAL PATH for KMP migration
- Effort: 3-4 weeks realistic estimate
Finding 2: Complex Patterns Require Careful Abstraction
- Real-time listeners:
.snapshots()→Flow<T>conversion - Transactions:
.runTransaction()→ High-level operation interfaces - Batch operations:
.batch()→ Abstracted batch APIs - Authentication:
FirebaseAuth.currentUser→RemoteAuthDataSource.getCurrentUserId()
Finding 3: Abstraction Enables iOS Support
- Interface-based design allows multiple implementations:
- Android: Firebase SDK
- iOS: GitLive Firebase SDK (or native Swift Firebase)
- KMP-compatible patterns (Flow, suspend functions, Result types)
iOS Investigation
Finding 1: GitLive SDK Statically Compatible (4.5/5)
- ✅ iOS compilation succeeds
- ✅ API surface matches Firebase SDK closely
- ✅ Supports core features (Firestore, Auth, Storage)
- ⏸️ Runtime behavior UNKNOWN (awaiting macOS)
Finding 2: Presenter Pattern Works on iOS (Static Validation)
- ✅ StateFlow observable from Swift
- ✅ Kotlin coroutines bridgeable to Swift async/await
- ✅ Zero Android imports in Presenters
- ⏸️ Performance UNKNOWN (awaiting runtime tests)
Finding 3: iOS Runtime Validation is Critical
- Risk: GitLive SDK may have runtime issues despite static compatibility
- Unknowns: Performance, memory management, offline sync, real-time listeners
- Mitigation: 5 critical tests planned for runtime validation
- Decision: GO/NO-GO based on runtime results
Week 17-19 Contribution
Agent 1 Status: PAUSED (awaiting macOS) Contribution: iOS PoC merged earlier (PR #207) Impact: Validated static compilation, unblocked Agent 2 ViewModel migrations
Decision Made: Continue ViewModel migrations (Agent 2) while waiting for macOS
- Path chosen: Path A (continue ViewModels, Agent 1 idle)
- Outcome: Week 17-19 completed successfully (10 ViewModels migrated)
- Agent 1 resumes when macOS arrives
Technical Debt Addressed
Firebase Coupling Investigation
Before Investigation:
- Firebase usage scattered throughout codebase
- No clear understanding of Firebase dependency scope
- Unknown effort to abstract Firebase
After Investigation:
- 10 Firebase imports catalogued
- 42 Firebase-dependent methods identified
- Clear abstraction strategy designed
- Realistic 3-4 week effort estimate
iOS Feasibility
Before Investigation:
- Unknown if iOS app is viable with KMP
- Unknown if GitLive SDK works
- Unknown effort to build iOS app
After Investigation:
- iOS app is viable (static validation passed)
- GitLive SDK compiles successfully (4.5/5)
- Runtime validation required for final decision
- Presenter pattern validated for iOS
Recommendations
Immediate (Week 20)
If macOS NOT arrived:
- Continue Path A (Agent 2 ViewModel migrations)
- Agent 1 remains idle
- Resume iOS work when macOS arrives
If macOS arrived:
- Execute Path B (Agent 1 iOS runtime validation) OR
- Execute Path C (Agent 1 iOS + Agent 2 ViewModels in parallel)
- Complete Phase 4 runtime validation (2-3 days)
- Make GO/NO-GO decision on GitLive SDK
Short-Term (Week 20-22)
Firebase Abstraction (CRITICAL PATH):
- Priority: Implement Firebase abstraction design (3-4 weeks)
- Unblocks: Service migration to shared:domain
- Enables: iOS Firebase support (via GitLive SDK)
iOS Runtime Validation (HIGH PRIORITY):
- Timing: When macOS arrives
- Duration: 2-3 days
- Outcome: GO (GitLive SDK) or NO-GO (pivot to native Swift Firebase)
Long-Term (Week 23+)
If GO (GitLive SDK):
- Implement remaining 22 GitLive Firebase methods
- Build iOS app with shared Presenters
- Test multi-platform Firebase integration
If NO-GO (Native Swift Firebase):
- Implement Swift-specific Firebase layer
- Build iOS app with shared Presenters (Firebase separate)
- Accept dual Firebase implementations (Android + iOS)
Blockers & Dependencies
Current Blockers
Blocker 1: macOS Hardware Unavailable
- Blocks: iOS runtime validation (Phase 4)
- Blocks: GO/NO-GO decision (Phase 5)
- ETA: ~1 week (ordered, arriving soon)
- Impact: Agent 1 idle, iOS work paused
Blocker 2: Firebase Abstraction Not Implemented
- Blocks: Service migration to shared:domain
- Blocks: iOS Firebase support
- Timeline: 3-4 weeks implementation
- Dependency: Agent 1 design complete (ready to implement)
Dependencies
ViewModel Migrations depend on:
- ✅ Presenter pattern established (Week 17-19 complete)
- ⏸️ Firebase abstraction (not blocking current work, blocks future services)
iOS Development depends on:
- ⏸️ macOS hardware (critical blocker)
- ⏸️ Runtime validation (GO/NO-GO decision)
- ✅ Presenter pattern (10 Presenters ready for iOS)
- ⏸️ Firebase abstraction (enables iOS Firebase support)
Work Remaining
Firebase Abstraction Implementation
Effort: 3-4 weeks Agent: TBD (Agent 1 design, Agent 2 could implement)
Tasks:
- Create RemoteDataSource interfaces (2-3 days)
- Implement FirebaseRemoteDataSource (5-7 days)
- Remove Firebase from domain layer (3-4 days)
- Update repositories (3-4 days)
- Test Firebase abstraction (2-3 days)
iOS Runtime Validation
Effort: 2-3 days (when macOS arrives) Agent: Agent 1 (AAP)
Tasks:
- iOS app creation (4-6 hours)
- GitLive Firebase setup (2-3 hours)
- Runtime tests (5 critical tests, 4-8 hours)
- GO/NO-GO decision (1-2 hours analysis)
5 Critical Tests:
- Firebase Auth: Sign in, sign out, auth state observation
- Firestore Read: Query tournaments, observe real-time updates
- Firestore Write: Create, update, delete operations
- Offline Sync: Offline writes, sync on reconnect
- Performance: Measure Presenter response time, memory usage
iOS App Development (if GO)
Effort: 4-6 weeks (after runtime validation) Agent: Agent 1 (AAP) + potential iOS specialist
Tasks:
- iOS UI implementation (SwiftUI screens)
- Presenter integration (all 10 Presenters + future)
- GitLive Firebase integration (22 remaining methods)
- iOS-specific platform abstractions
- Testing (unit, integration, E2E)
Related Work
Weeks 17-19 ViewModel Migrations:
- Agent 2 migrated 10 ViewModels while Agent 1 paused
- All 10 Presenters are iOS-ready (zero Android imports)
- Runtime validation will test these 10 Presenters on iOS
Firebase Abstraction Design:
- Unblocks service migration to shared:domain
- Enables iOS Firebase support (GitLive or native)
- Critical path for KMP migration completion
Recognition
Agent 1 delivered critical architectural work despite macOS blocker:
- ⭐ Architectural Design: Firebase abstraction design complete
- ⭐ iOS Feasibility: Static validation passed (4.5/5)
- ⭐ Pattern Validation: Presenter → SwiftUI ViewModel pattern designed
- ⭐ Risk Assessment: Identified unknowns, planned mitigation (5 critical tests)
- ⭐ Pragmatic Approach: Paused at 60% (appropriate given macOS unavailability)
Overall Assessment: 60% complete, on hold for macOS, ready to resume runtime validation
Next Steps
Immediate (When macOS Arrives):
- Complete Phase 4: iOS runtime validation (2-3 days)
- Run 5 critical tests (Firebase, Presenters, performance)
- Complete Phase 5: GO/NO-GO decision
- Resume full iOS development OR pivot to native Swift Firebase
Short-Term (Week 20-22):
- Option A: Wait for macOS, continue ViewModel migrations (Agent 2)
- Option B: Start Firebase abstraction implementation (Agent 1 design → Agent 2 implementation)
- Option C: Parallel work when macOS arrives (Agent 1 iOS + Agent 2 ViewModels)
Long-Term (Week 23+):
- iOS app development (if GO on GitLive SDK)
- Dual Firebase implementation (if NO-GO, use native Swift Firebase)
- Multi-platform testing and validation
Related Documentation
- Weeks 17-19 Overview
docs/kmp-migration/FIREBASE_ABSTRACTION_DESIGN.md(Agent 1 deliverable)docs/kmp-migration/WEEK_15_20_INVESTIGATION_FINDINGS.md(Firebase coupling analysis)
Tags
agent-1 aap ios-investigation firebase-abstraction gitlive-sdk runtime-validation platform-abstractions architectural-design paused
Status
⏸️ PAUSED AT 60%
- Design work: 100% complete
- Static validation: 100% complete (4.5/5)
- Runtime validation: 0% complete (blocked by macOS)
- GO/NO-GO decision: Pending runtime validation
- Ready to resume when macOS arrives