Week 20-21: God Class Discovery & Repository Layer Investigation

Period: November 2025 Focus: God class campaign launch and repository layer investigation Critical Finding: 10 god classes discovered (3.2x larger than expected)

Executive Summary

Week 20 launched the god class reduction campaign with conservative scoping and all 4 agents deployed. Week 21 transitions to tackling the critical iOS blocker (repository layer) while continuing proven quick wins.

Week 20 Results:

661 lines reduced across 3 PRs (4.1% of 16,211 total god class lines)
30 logs migrated to LoggingProvider pattern (7% of 452 total)
Agent cross-review system validated - caught memory leak regression in PR #213
Conservative scoping proven - all PRs merged successfully

Critical Discovery:

10 god classes identified (previously thought to be 3)
Total: 16,211 lines (3.2x larger problem than originally assessed)
iOS blocker discovered: Repository layer (3,726 lines) must be refactored before iOS work can proceed
Timeline impact: +8 weeks to iOS readiness

Week 21 Strategy:

Option 2 (Balanced) approved - 3 agents active
Target: 1,200-1,400 lines reduced (7.4-8.6% of total)
Strategic focus: Start repository layer investigation (addresses iOS blocker)
Risk: Medium (repository work is investigative, has escape hatch)

Week 20 Achievements

PRs Merged

PR #214: Agent 1 (AAP) - RoundViewModel Stub Cleanup

Impact: 55 lines removed (3.5% reduction)

Work Completed:

Removed 3 deprecated ERROR-level stub methods from RoundViewModel
RoundViewModel: 1,582 → 1,527 lines
Methods removed:
1. finalizeEnd() - 11 lines
2. addArrowScore() - 10 lines
3. completeCurrentEnd() - 27 lines
4. - 6 lines of blank lines/documentation

Risk Level: Medium

All methods were ERROR-level deprecations (already failing compilation)
Test adapter routes to LiveScoringViewModel (safe)
Build successful, no regressions

Phase 2 Status: ⏸️ TABLED

COMPATIBILITY STUBS section (100-200 lines) deferred to Week 21+
Reason: Week 20 goals achieved, focus on merging current PRs

PR #212: Agent 3 (AAA) - ActiveScoringScreen UI Extraction Phase 1

Impact: 235 lines removed (11.7% reduction) + 30 logs migrated

Work Completed:

Extracted 3 composables from ActiveScoringScreen (2,011 → 1,776 lines)
Components extracted:
1. ParticipantSelector (~80 lines) - Participant selection dropdown
2. EndInputCard (~100 lines) - Arrow scoring input card
3. ScoringSummary (~55 lines) - Current end scoring summary

LoggingProvider Demo:

Migrated 30 android.util.Log calls to LoggingProvider pattern
Established template for bulk migration (422 remaining logs)
Pattern: Module-level logger for KMP compatibility

Quality:

Clean component boundaries with callback-based communication
Comprehensive KDoc documentation
100% test coverage maintained

Phase 2 Potential: 600 more lines available (4 additional composables identified)

PR #213: Agent 2 (AAM) - 3 ViewModel Migrations

Impact: 371 lines removed (49.7% avg reduction)

ViewModels Migrated:

RoundDisplayViewModel: 221 → 47 lines (78.7% reduction)
SettingsViewModel: 227 → 109 lines (52.0% reduction)
TournamentCreationViewModel: 298 → 219 lines (26.5% reduction)

Quality Gate Event:

Agent 3 review discovered memory leak pattern in 2/3 Presenters
Issue: Used asStateFlow() instead of stateIn()
Agent 2 fixed immediately (PR #213 updated)
Result: Prevented Week 17-18 memory leak pattern from reaching production

Memory Leak Fix:

// ❌ WRONG (memory leak)
init {
    scope.launch {
        repository.getData().collectLatest {
            _data.value = it  // Leak!
        }
    }
}
 
// ✅ CORRECT (no leak)
val data: StateFlow<T> = repository.getData()
    .stateIn(scope, SharingStarted.Eagerly, initialValue)

Test Coverage: 75/75 tests passing

Week 20 Summary

Total Reduced: 661 lines (4.1% of 16,211 total god class lines)

Agent Contributions:

Agent 1 (AAP): 55 lines (RoundViewModel stub cleanup)
Agent 2 (AAM): 371 lines (3 ViewModel migrations)
Agent 3 (AAA): 235 lines + 30 logs (UI extraction + LoggingProvider demo)
Agent D (DOC): 2 vault PRs merged (Weeks 17-19 summary + god class discovery)

Quality Metrics:

✅ 100% test coverage maintained (4,034+ tests passing)
✅ Zero regressions shipped
✅ Agent cross-review caught memory leak (quality gate works!)
✅ Conservative scoping prevented overcommitment

Strategic Achievements:

Cross-review system validated - Agent 3 caught memory leak in Agent 2’s work
LoggingProvider pattern established - Template for 422 remaining logs
UI extraction pattern proven - 3 composables, clean boundaries, ready for Phase 2
Conservative scoping effective - All PRs merged on time

Critical Discovery: 10 God Classes

Original Assessment (Pre-Week 20)

3 god classes identified:

LiveScoringViewModel - 1,497 lines
RoundViewModel - 1,581 lines
ActiveScoringScreen - 2,011 lines

Estimated effort: 13 weeks Timeline to iOS: 3 months

Revised Assessment (Week 20 Discovery)

10 god classes identified - 3.2x larger problem!

Tier 1: Critical iOS Blockers (3,726 lines)

Repository layer crisis - blocks iOS migration

4. FirebaseTournamentRepository - 1,912 lines 🚨

Blocks Firebase abstraction for KMP
52 public methods, 8 distinct concerns
Must be split before iOS work can proceed
Concerns: Discovery, CRUD, Participants, Scoring, Rounds, Settings, Sync, Deletion

5. HybridTournamentRepository - 1,814 lines 🚨

Blocks iOS migration (tight coupling to Android)
Coordinator between offline and Firebase repositories
Requires 4 repository extractions (estimated Weeks 21-24)
Dependencies: OfflineTournamentRepository, FirebaseTournamentRepository

7. RoundRepository - 1,518 lines

Part of repository layer refactoring
Medium priority (after Tournament repositories)

Repository Layer Total: 3,726 lines (23% of total god class problem)

Tier 2: Active Development Targets (4,489 lines)

Currently being reduced in Weeks 20-21

1. LiveScoringViewModel - 1,497 lines

5 services already extracted (Week 15-16)
Remaining: 2 services to extract (Arrow scoring, Participant state)
Target: Reduce to 600-800 lines

2. RoundViewModel - 1,581 lines (1,527 after Week 20)

Week 20: 55 lines removed (Phase 1)
Week 21 planned: 100-200 more lines (Phase 2 - COMPATIBILITY STUBS)
Target: Reduce to 500-600 lines via ViewModel split

3. ActiveScoringScreen - 2,011 lines (1,776 after Week 20)

Week 20: 235 lines extracted (3 composables)
Week 21 planned: 600 more lines (4 composables)
Target: Reduce to <1,000 lines

Tier 3: Future Targets (8,996 lines)

To be addressed after repository layer and active targets

TournamentDetailsScreen - 1,725 lines
TournamentDetailsViewModel - 1,418 lines
RoundDetailsScreen - 1,215 lines
RoundScoringEntryScreen - 1,011 lines

Impact Analysis

Total God Class Lines: 16,211 lines (was thought to be ~5,000)

Breakdown by Layer:

Repository Layer (Tier 1): 3,726 lines (23%) - iOS BLOCKER
ViewModel Layer: 7,496 lines (46%)
UI Layer: 4,989 lines (31%)

Timeline Revision:

Original estimate: 13 weeks (pre-discovery)
Revised estimate: +8 weeks (repository layer blocker)
New iOS readiness target: Week 26 (projected)

Why +8 Weeks?

Repository layer must be refactored before iOS Firebase abstraction
3,726 lines is complex work (8 distinct concerns across 2 repositories)
Cannot parallelize (dependencies between repositories)
Week 21 starts investigation, Weeks 22-25 execute extraction plan

iOS Blocker Identified

The Problem

Firebase Abstraction Blocked:

iOS development requires RemoteDataSource interfaces (KMP-compatible)
Current code: Direct Firebase Android SDK usage in repository layer
Blocker: FirebaseTournamentRepository (1,912 lines) and HybridTournamentRepository (1,814 lines) are tightly coupled to Firebase Android SDK

Why This Blocks iOS:

Firebase Android SDK is not KMP-compatible
iOS Firebase integration requires abstracted RemoteDataSource interfaces
Repository layer has 8 distinct concerns (Discovery, CRUD, Participants, etc.)
Cannot create clean RemoteDataSource until repository is split

Code Example (current problem):

// ❌ Current: Direct Firebase usage (Android-specific)
class FirebaseTournamentRepository(
    private val firestore: FirebaseFirestore,  // Android SDK
    private val auth: FirebaseAuth             // Android SDK
) {
    suspend fun getTournaments(): List<Tournament> {
        return firestore.collection("tournaments")
            .get()  // Android-specific call
            .await()
            .toObjects(Tournament::class.java)
    }
}

What’s Needed (iOS-compatible):

// ✅ Target: Abstracted RemoteDataSource (KMP-compatible)
interface TournamentRemoteDataSource {
    suspend fun getTournaments(): List<Tournament>
}
 
// Android implementation
class FirebaseTournamentDataSource(
    private val firestore: FirebaseFirestore
) : TournamentRemoteDataSource {
    // ... Android Firebase implementation
}
 
// iOS implementation
class IOSTournamentDataSource(
    // ... iOS Firebase SDK
) : TournamentRemoteDataSource {
    // ... iOS Firebase implementation
}

The Solution

Week 21 Strategy (Agent 3):

Phase 1: Investigate HybridTournamentRepository (1,814 lines)
Phase 2: Extract 1-2 safe repositories (TournamentDiscoveryRepository OR TournamentSettingsRepository)
Phase 3: Document full repository split roadmap for Weeks 22-25

Repository Split Plan (estimated Weeks 21-24):

Week 21: TournamentDiscoveryRepository (400-600 lines)
Week 22: TournamentSettingsRepository (300-500 lines)
Week 23: TournamentParticipantRepository (400-600 lines)
Week 24: Remaining concerns (scoring, rounds, sync, deletion)

When Complete:

FirebaseTournamentRepository reduced from 1,912 → ~500 lines
HybridTournamentRepository reduced from 1,814 → ~500 lines
Clean RemoteDataSource interfaces available for iOS
iOS Firebase abstraction unblocked

Escape Hatch:

If extraction proves too complex in Week 21, deliver investigation + roadmap only
Week 22+ can execute extraction with more time

Week 21 Strategy: Option 2 (Balanced)

Overview

Scope: 28% god class reduction (estimated 1,200-1,400 lines) Time: 30-35 hours/week Risk: Medium Agents: 3 active (Agent 1 + Agent 2 + Agent 3)

Why Option 2?

Addresses iOS blocker - Agent 3 starts repository layer work
Proven patterns - Extends Week 20 successes (UI extraction, stub cleanup)
Balanced workload - Each agent has 1 clear focus
Risk management - Repository work has escape hatch (doc-only if complex)
Maintains quality - Agent cross-review continues

Agent Assignments

Agent 1 (AAP): RoundViewModel Phase 2 Stub Cleanup

Target: 100-200 lines removed Time: 8-10 hours Risk: Low

Task: Complete COMPATIBILITY STUBS assessment (tabled in Week 20)

Scope:

RoundViewModel.kt lines 1174-1520+ (COMPATIBILITY STUBS section)
Remove deprecated stub methods marked for cleanup
Continue preparing for RoundCreationViewModel extraction

Success Criteria:

✅ 100-200 lines removed
✅ Build passing
✅ Tests passing (adapter routing verified)
✅ PR created with clear migration notes

Week 20 Precedent: Phase 1 removed 55 lines (3 stubs) successfully

Agent 2 (AAM): ActiveScoringScreen UI Extraction Phase 2

Target: 600 lines removed Time: 15-18 hours Risk: Medium

Task: Extract 3-4 more composables from ActiveScoringScreen

Week 20 Baseline:

ActiveScoringScreen: 2,011 → 1,776 lines (235 lines extracted)

Week 21 Target:

ActiveScoringScreen: 1,776 → 1,176 lines (600 lines extracted, 34% reduction)

Candidate Components:

ParticipantTabs (~150 lines) - Tab navigation for multi-participant rounds
RoundProgressHeader (~200 lines) - Round info, progress, stats display
ScoringControls (~150 lines) - Arrow input buttons and controls
EndSummaryCard (~100 lines) - Completed end summary display

Success Criteria:

✅ 3-4 composables extracted to components/ package
✅ 600 lines reduction (34% additional reduction)
✅ Clean component boundaries (no tight coupling)
✅ Build passing
✅ Comprehensive KDoc documentation

Week 20 Precedent: Phase 1 extracted 3 composables (235 lines) successfully

Agent 3 (AAA): Repository Layer Investigation 🚨 CRITICAL

Target: 400-600 lines extracted + roadmap Time: 14-18 hours Risk: Medium-High

Task: Investigate HybridTournamentRepository + extract 1-2 safe repositories

Phase 1: Investigation (6-8 hours)

Analyze HybridTournamentRepository (1,814 lines)
Identify concerns (Discovery, CRUD, Participants, Scoring, Rounds, Settings)
Map dependencies (OfflineTournamentRepository, FirebaseTournamentRepository)
Identify 1-2 safe extractions with minimal risk

Phase 2: Extraction (6-8 hours)

Extract TournamentDiscoveryRepository OR TournamentSettingsRepository
Target: 400-600 lines extracted
Create comprehensive tests
Document remaining work for Weeks 22-25

Phase 3: Documentation (2-3 hours)

Create repository split roadmap
Document god class reduction strategy for all 10 classes
Update investigation findings

Success Criteria:

✅ 400-600 lines extracted from HybridTournamentRepository
✅ Comprehensive roadmap for repository layer refactoring
✅ Tests passing for extracted repository
✅ Documented plan for FirebaseTournamentRepository (1,912 lines)

Escape Hatch: If extraction proves too complex, deliver investigation + roadmap only (documentation deliverable)

Strategic Importance: This work addresses the iOS blocker and de-risks the critical path to iOS readiness.

Success Metrics

Quantitative Targets:

Lines Reduced: 1,200-1,400 lines (UI + RoundViewModel + Repository)
God Class Progress: 7.4-8.6% of total 16,211 lines reduced
Repository Investigation: iOS blocker assessed, roadmap created

Qualitative Targets:

✅ Agent cross-review continues (quality gate)
✅ Repository layer de-risked (investigation complete)
✅ Proven patterns extended (UI extraction Phase 2)
✅ All PRs merged with zero regressions

Strategic Targets:

✅ iOS blocker addressed - Repository layer work started
✅ Weeks 22-25 roadmap - Clear path forward
✅ Conservative pace - Sustainable velocity proven

Week 21 Execution (2025-11-09)

Status: ✅ COMPLETE

Strategy: Option 2 (Balanced) - 3 agents active

Actual Results

Agent 2 (AAM) - ActiveScoringScreen Phase 2:

✅ PR #216 merged
Extracted: 3 composables (495 lines)
- StatisticsSummaryCard.kt (363 lines)
- EndOfRoundCard.kt (165 lines)
- RoundCompleteCard.kt (177 lines)
ActiveScoringScreen: 1,784 → 1,289 lines (27.7% reduction)
Cumulative (Phase 1+2): 730 lines total (38.4% of original 2,011 lines)
Innovation: Component reuse pattern established (StatItem shared across components)

Agent 3 (AAA) - Repository Investigation:

✅ PR #217 merged
Investigation documents: 2,500+ lines
- HybridTournamentRepository: 1,878 lines, 50+ methods, 8 concerns
- Identified: 1,010 lines extractable (54%)
- Prioritized: 6 repositories (Settings, Discovery, Sync, Rounds, Utils, Moderation)
- Test estimates: 75-91 tests across all extractions
Weeks 22-25 roadmap created (1,200+ lines)
iOS blocker fully assessed (3,726 lines)

Agent 1 (AAP) - Investigation + LoggingProvider:

✅ PR #218 merged
Investigation: COMPATIBILITY STUBS analysis (333 lines)
- Finding: Active compatibility layer (374 lines), not deprecated stubs
- Categories: 7 identified (Round Management, Creation, Live Scoring, etc.)
- Recommendation: Defer to Phase 3 (Weeks 22-23, 20-30 hours)
LoggingProvider migration: 134 logs (30.5% of codebase)
- RoundRepository.kt: 45 logs
- LiveScoringViewModel.kt: 89 logs
- Zero android.util.Log calls remaining in migrated files
- Remaining: 306 logs (Week 22 target: ~120 logs)

Week 21 Totals:

Lines reduced: 495 lines (ActiveScoringScreen god class reduction)
Logs migrated: 134 logs (30.5% of codebase → LoggingProvider pattern)
Documentation: 2,500+ lines (repository investigation + Weeks 22-25 roadmap)
Strategic value: iOS blocker de-risked, clear execution path for 4 weeks

Success Metrics:

✅ 495 lines extracted (41% of 1,200-1,400 line target - revised scope with investigation work)
✅ 30.5% of logging migration complete (134/440 logs)
✅ Repository layer fully assessed (3,726 lines mapped)
✅ Weeks 22-25 roadmap created with line-level extraction guides
✅ Component reuse pattern established (first cross-component reuse)

Week 22 Readiness

Agent 2 (AAM) - Repository Extractions:

TournamentSettingsRepository (~80 lines, 10-12 tests, 3-5 hours)
TournamentDiscoveryRepository (~280 lines, 15-18 tests, 6-8 hours)
Shared helpers extraction (ID mapping, merge helpers)
Total: ~360 lines, 10-12 hours

Agent 1 (AAP) - LoggingProvider Batch 2:

TournamentDetailsViewModel.kt (52 logs, ~2 hours)
EndCompletionService.kt (36 logs, ~1.5 hours)
ActiveScoringScreen.kt (32 logs, ~1.5 hours)
Total: ~120 logs, ~5 hours

iOS Blocker Status:

Investigation: ✅ Complete
Extraction: Starting Week 22
Timeline: 4 weeks (Weeks 22-25) to complete repository layer refactoring

Cross-Review Quality: 100% approval rate

Agent 3 approved PR #216 (Agent 2)
Agent 2 approved PR #217 (Agent 3)
Agent 2 approved PR #218 (Agent 1)

Lessons Learned

Week 20 Lessons

1. Cross-Review Quality Gate Works

Agent 3 reviewed Agent 2’s PR #213
Found 2/3 Presenters using asStateFlow() instead of stateIn()
Blocked merge, required fix, prevented memory leak in production
Lesson: Multi-agent validation prevents regressions

2. Conservative Scoping Prevents Overcommitment

Week 20 targeted 661 lines (conservative)
Result: All 3 PRs merged successfully
Alternative: Aggressive scoping would have risked incomplete work
Lesson: Better to under-promise and over-deliver

3. Proven Patterns Replicate Well

UI extraction pattern (Week 20) proven successful
ViewModel migration pattern (Weeks 17-19) continues to work
Agent 1’s stub cleanup pattern effective
Lesson: Validate patterns before scaling

4. Documentation-First Discovery Works

Agent 3 analyzed codebase and discovered 7 additional god classes
Total problem 3.2x larger than originally thought
Early discovery allows timeline adjustment
Lesson: Invest in analysis before committing to timelines

Week 21 Lessons

Note: This section will be updated after Week 21 execution.

[To be filled with lessons learned from Week 21 work]

Weeks 22-25 Preview

Note: This section will be updated after Agent 3 completes repository investigation.

Projected Roadmap

Week 22: Repository Layer Phase 2

[Based on Agent 3’s investigation findings]
Estimated: 400-600 lines reduced

Week 23: Repository Layer Phase 3

[Based on Agent 3’s roadmap]
Estimated: 400-600 lines reduced

Week 24: Repository Layer Phase 4

[Complete repository split]
Estimated: 400-600 lines reduced

Week 25: iOS Readiness Validation

Firebase abstraction complete
RemoteDataSource interfaces defined
iOS work unblocked

iOS Timeline: Week 26+ (projected)

Cumulative Progress Tracking

Week 20 Baseline (After PRs Merged)

ActiveScoringScreen: 1,776 lines (was 2,011)
RoundViewModel: 1,527 lines (was 1,582)
LiveScoringViewModel: 1,497 lines (unchanged Week 20)
HybridTournamentRepository: 1,814 lines (unchanged)
FirebaseTournamentRepository: 1,912 lines (unchanged)

Week 21 Targets

ActiveScoringScreen: 1,776 → 1,176 lines (600 lines reduced, 34%)
RoundViewModel: 1,527 → 1,327 lines (200 lines reduced, 13%)
HybridTournamentRepository: 1,814 → 1,214-1,414 lines (400-600 lines reduced, 22-33%)

Cumulative God Class Progress

Week 20: 661 lines reduced (4.1% of 16,211 total)
Week 21 Target: 1,200-1,400 additional lines (7.4-8.6%)
Cumulative (Weeks 20-21): 1,861-2,061 lines (11.5-12.7% of total)

Remaining: 14,150-14,350 lines (87.3-88.5% of total)

Projected Completion (at current pace):

Average: ~1,300 lines/week
Remaining weeks: ~11 weeks
iOS readiness: Week 26 (late November 2025)

Agent Cross-Review Protocol

Week 20 Protocol (Established)

Agent 3 reviews Agent 2 (ViewModel migrations):

Check memory leak prevention pattern (stateIn vs collectLatest)
Verify test coverage (all tests passing)
Validate KMP compatibility (no Android imports in Presenters)
Confirm pattern consistency

Agent 2 reviews Agent 1 (if needed):

Verify stub removal safety
Check test adapter routing
Validate build success

Result: Caught memory leak regression in PR #213 before merge

Week 21 Protocol (Planned)

Cross-review assignments:

Agent 2 reviews Agent 1’s PR (RoundViewModel Phase 2)
Agent 3 reviews Agent 2’s PR (ActiveScoringScreen Phase 2)
Agent 1 reviews Agent 3’s PR (Repository extraction, if applicable)

Quality Gate: No PR merges without cross-review approval

Risk Assessment

Week 21 Risks

1. Repository Layer Complexity (Agent 3) - Medium-High

HybridTournamentRepository has 8 concerns
Dependency on OfflineTournamentRepository and FirebaseTournamentRepository
Mitigation: Investigation phase first, escape hatch to documentation-only

2. ActiveScoringScreen Complexity (Agent 2) - Medium

Composables may have tight coupling
Mitigation: Week 20 proved extraction works, follow same pattern

3. RoundViewModel Compatibility Layer (Agent 1) - Low

Stubs may still be in use by UI code
Mitigation: Grep analysis before removal, adapter pattern proven in Week 20

4. Cross-Agent Dependencies - Low

Agent 2 and Agent 3 both need Agent 1’s context for reviews
Mitigation: Agent 1 completes work first, Agent 2/3 cross-review each other

Overall Risk Level: Medium

Week 20 proved conservative scoping works. Option 2 extends proven patterns with one investigative task (Agent 3 repository work) that has an escape hatch.

Week 20 God Class Discovery - Detailed analysis of all 10 god classes
Weeks 17-19 Overview - ViewModel migration campaign
Memory Leak Prevention Pattern - stateIn vs collectLatest
Combined PR Strategy - When to merge multiple weeks
Agent 2 Week 17-19 Summary - ViewModel migration velocity
Agent 3 Week 17-19 Summary - Quality gate validation

References

Source Documents

docs/AGENT_MESSAGES/WEEK_21/ORCHESTRATOR_WEEK_21_PLANNING.md - Week 21 strategy
docs/AGENT_MESSAGES/WEEK_20/AGENT_1_CREATE_PR.md - Agent 1 Week 20 work
docs/AGENT_MESSAGES/WEEK_20/AGENT_3_REVIEW_PR_213.md - Cross-review findings
docs/AGENT_MESSAGES/WEEK_20/AGENT_2_FIX_PR_213_MEMORY_LEAKS.md - Memory leak fix

Main Repo References

GOD_CLASS_EXTRACTION_PLANS.md - Detailed extraction plans for all 10 classes
WEEK_15_20_INVESTIGATION_FINDINGS.md - Investigation findings (to be created/updated)

Status

Week 20: ✅ COMPLETE - 661 lines reduced, 3 PRs merged
Week 21: 🔄 IN PROGRESS - Agents executing Option 2 (Balanced)
Documentation: 🔄 IN PROGRESS - Will finalize after Week 21 results

Last Updated: 2025-11-09 (Week 21 start)

Archery Apprentice Documentation

Explorer

Week 20-21: God Class Discovery & Repository Layer Investigation

Week 20-21: God Class Discovery & Repository Layer Investigation

Executive Summary

Week 20 Achievements

PRs Merged

PR #214: Agent 1 (AAP) - RoundViewModel Stub Cleanup

PR #212: Agent 3 (AAA) - ActiveScoringScreen UI Extraction Phase 1

PR #213: Agent 2 (AAM) - 3 ViewModel Migrations

Week 20 Summary

Critical Discovery: 10 God Classes

Original Assessment (Pre-Week 20)

Revised Assessment (Week 20 Discovery)

Tier 1: Critical iOS Blockers (3,726 lines)

Tier 2: Active Development Targets (4,489 lines)

Tier 3: Future Targets (8,996 lines)

Impact Analysis

iOS Blocker Identified

The Problem

The Solution

Week 21 Strategy: Option 2 (Balanced)

Overview

Agent Assignments

Agent 1 (AAP): RoundViewModel Phase 2 Stub Cleanup

Agent 2 (AAM): ActiveScoringScreen UI Extraction Phase 2

Agent 3 (AAA): Repository Layer Investigation 🚨 CRITICAL

Success Metrics

Week 21 Execution (2025-11-09)

Actual Results

Week 22 Readiness

Lessons Learned

Week 20 Lessons

Week 21 Lessons

Weeks 22-25 Preview

Projected Roadmap

Cumulative Progress Tracking

Week 20 Baseline (After PRs Merged)

Week 21 Targets

Cumulative God Class Progress

Agent Cross-Review Protocol

Week 20 Protocol (Established)

Week 21 Protocol (Planned)

Risk Assessment

Week 21 Risks

Related Documentation

References

Source Documents

Main Repo References

Tags

Status

Graph View

Table of Contents

Backlinks